Sexual ethics

From TrinityWiki
Revision as of 16:20, 26 March 2026 by Markus Brummer (talk | contribs) (Some typos)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sexuality

To define the ethics of sexuality, one must first define what is sexuality and what is its purpose.

What it is

Sexual dimorphism means that a species has two distinct forms of existence, called the male and the female, which must somehow come together to perform their intended function.

Bacteria do not have this differentiation, boy bacteria and girl bacteria are simply rhetorical devices. Also, there's no actual mother and daughter, or father and son cells, when they clone themselves.

Human beings have this wonderful distinction of being divided into males and females.

What is its purpose

The purpose of sexuality is reproduction.

This is an analytical fact that all biologists know. Analytical fact means, that when you understand the concept itself, the consequence follows logically necessarily from the definition.

Ethics

Ethics tries to analyze the proper ways of acting and being, to understand what is good and how to orient towards it.

All theories of ethics assume the following fact:

Evil is a violation of purpose

When something bad has happened, or some evil has been done, the first thing that pops to mind is always it should not be this way, which assumes, that there is proper way, or an actual goal that should be achieved, or in other words, purpose.

Things should be or happen one way, and not the other way.

Sexual ethics

The foundation of sexual ethics therefore is:

  • Evil is a violation of purpose
  • The purpose of sexuality is reproduction
  • Therefore, sexual acts that, in principle, can have nothing to do with reproduction, are evil

Therefore, gays are evil.

This is a logically necessary conclusion after understanding the definition of evil and the definition of sexuality.

Marriage as a union of one man and one woman, together raising their offspring, actually makes sense, because it aligns itself with the purpose of human sexuality.

Sexual revolution

All members of the sexual revolution are fornicating morons who do their utmost to rebel against logic and deny the purpose of sexuality, and prefer to think that

The purpose of sexuality is pleasure

When people accept this premise, then there no longer is any limiting principle for sexual activity. Anything is permitted, anything you can or cannot think of.

Even any sexual activity that is currently outlawed is ok, as long as it gives pleasure to somebody.

All the people, who want to defend gays and what they do to each other, must accept the premise of the sexual revolution, and all that necessarily follows from it.