TrinityWiki - User contributions [en]

Bible errors

2026-05-03T13:06:16Z

Markus Brummer: Book of Job

= Old Testament =

== Book of Job ==

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=NIV Job 1]

The preface in the book of Job alone loudly proclaims that the God referred to is not and simply cannot be Yahweh. This reads like a parody of God.

# God and Satan are described as neighbourhood friends who occasionally greet each other and gossip about their followers
# God does not know Job's motives for serving Him, which obviously means he cannot be omniscient
# God declared Job righteous AND gives him to Satan to be tortured, which makes God malicious

Job loses everything and faces pain, torture and stupid opinions from his friends. He puts God on trial, based on righteousness and justice.


*When God responds, there are only loud declarations about how powerful and knowledgeable God is
* which means He does not answer the accusation
* which is an admission of guilt


Job is restored, because '''he was innocent'''. Job put God on trial and won.

Therefore, the God presented in the book of Job is not Yahweh.

= New Testament =

== Parable of the Lost Son ==

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2015%3A11-32&version=NIV Luke 15:11-32]: The Parable of the Lost Son

This parable is a lie.

=== Two options ===

Logically speaking, there are two options regarding grace:

* God will always wait for sinners to come back to restoration
* God will not wait forever for sinners to come back but will judge them, eternally

This parable claims that God the Father is always waiting for sinners to come back to restoration.

This means, that God can actually never condemn sinners, but he '''must wait''' for people to come back on their own terms and on their on schedule. Grace is fully on man's terms, whenever he needs it or wants it, he can just bash into the Kingdom of God whenever he wants.

This is an egregious lie.

=== Holiness of God ===

God is holy, therefore He must always punish sin, and his love and waiting must therefore have a limit. The Kingdom of God works on God's terms, not on man's terms. God will stop waiting for men to end their insanity, and will judge them for their actions.

Main Page

2026-04-23T19:13:21Z

Markus Brummer: Bible errors

Bible errors

2026-04-23T19:12:37Z

Markus Brummer: Bible errors, the Lost Son

= Old Testament =

= New Testament =

== Parable of the Lost Son ==

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2015%3A11-32&version=NIV Luke 15:11-32]: The Parable of the Lost Son

This parable is a lie.

=== Two options ===

Logically speaking, there are two options regarding grace:

* God will always wait for sinners to come back to restoration
* God will not wait forever for sinners to come back but will judge them, eternally

This parable claims that God the Father is always waiting for sinners to come back to restoration.

This means, that God can actually never condemn sinners, but he '''must wait''' for people to come back on their own terms and on their on schedule. Grace is fully on man's terms, whenever he needs it or wants it, he can just bash into the Kingdom of God whenever he wants.

This is an egregious lie.

=== Holiness of God ===

God is holy, therefore He must always punish sin, and his love and waiting must therefore have a limit. The Kingdom of God works on God's terms, not on man's terms. God will stop waiting for men to end their insanity, and will judge them for their actions.

Main Page

2026-04-10T21:04:53Z

Markus Brummer: Consequentialism

Consequentialism

2026-04-10T21:04:20Z

Markus Brummer: Consequentialism

= Definition =

Consequentialism is a theory of ethics, that holds that morally right actions are those that produce a good outcome.

== Why it is false ==

The main problem of consequentialism is that it is actually empty itself and must always smuggle another ethical theory to valuate, what is actually the good outcome that should be desired.

Example:

In 1950, a woman is giving birth, and medical technology has progressed so far that doctors can diagnose a heart condition in the fetus. After birth, it is very likely that the baby can suffer heart failure.

Consequentialism is silent on how to evaluate the best future outcome.

* If we choose eugenics as the ethical theory to follow, then this diagnostical capability brings progress in culling the weak babies from mankind
* If we choose Christian ethics, where all human beings are created in the image of God, and therefore have a right to life, doctors can have necessary equipment at the ready when the woman goes into labor

And of course, one can try any other ethical theory to decide what should be done, but, consequentialism does not include it within itself. People always smuggle some ethical theory into discussion within consequentialism.

CIA

2026-03-28T12:20:07Z

Markus Brummer: Typo

= The Sins of the CIA =

Dennis Prager interviewed RFK Jr in 2023 when he was running for president.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRkDDODJ84 Interview]

== Sin #1 Spreading propaganda around the world and also in America ==

17:35-22:40

The CIA had in 1973 Operation Mockingbird that employed over 400 journalists across America to spread propaganda among the public. It was of course illegal to do so. The CIA has an approximately 10 billion dollar budget to influence political opinions around the world, which means they can spread propaganda and lies as they see fit. In 2016, Barack Obama signed an executive order that allowed the CIA to continue its propaganda efforts also on American soil.

== Sin #2 Illegal Bioweapons Program ==

23:00-34:27

The CIA's first task was Operation Paperclip, in which they recruited Nazi and Japanese war criminals to develop bioweapons in the United States. They were given new identities, new jobs and immunity from prosecution for war crimes. Richard Nixon decided to end the bioweapons program in 1969 and signed the Bioweapons charter, which the CIA, and therefore also the US Government, broke by secretly continuing the development of bioweapons.

== Sin #3 Anthrax attack on Congress in 2001 ==

Congress was debating the Patriot Act in 2001. The Act had a provision to give immunity from prosecution for federal officials who were found breaking the Geneva conventions and the Bioweapons charter, which carried a hanging offense. Two senators, who were stronly against the Act, Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, got an athrax letter to their offices in Congress. The FBI investigation concluded, that the Ames Anthrax had biological indicators pointing towards the CIA bioweapons program in Fort Dietrich.

One or more people in the CIA committed treason by attempting to murder members of the US Senate.

Also, the CIA also fits the description of a [https://legalclarity.org/18-u-s-c-2331-definitions-of-domestic-and-international-terrorism/ terrorist organization].

'''For this reason alone, all of CIA should be fired and permanently banned from the federal government.'''

== Sin #4 Corona virus ==

Since it was the CIA, who decided to illegally continue the bioweapons programs, it was legally feasible only as a dual use vaccine project. In order to use bioweapons on the field, own troops need to be immunized to the effects of the virus.

The CIA transferred the program to the Pentagon, which handed it over to the NIH and Anthony Fauci. The NIH transferred the vaccine and bioweapons program overseas to China, to a laboratory in Wuhan.

The Covid-19 epidemic was accidentally released from said lab, and the ensuing deaths are actually not fundamentally the fault of the CCP, but the CIA.

'''The CIA and the US Government handed over a bioweapons program to the Chinese Communist Party, in effect, for free.'''

'''The CIA is ultimately responsible for Corona Virus death toll, which is in the neighbourhood of 6 to 7 million people worldwide. This is more than jewish deaths during the Holocaust.'''

== Sin #5 The Murder of Jeffrey Epstein ==

Jeffrey Epstein was running a sex trafficking ring for the rich and wealthy people of the world. He was jailed and awaited trial, when he was found dead in his jail cell.

The video evidence was destroyed, that is why it was never found. The DOJ was recently released footage, which is incomplete. The metadata also reveals that it was edited with video editing programs, therefore it is an attempted coverup.

'''Therefore, step 1, Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his jail cell.'''

To achieve this, only the CIA has the information and the technology to pull this off. The operatives had to know the layout of the federal prison, impersonate a guard, and destroy video evidence from secure facilities.

'''Therefore, step 2, the CIA is the culprit.'''

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VccCLqwoZeo?t=260 Hindustani Times] reports that Donald Trump flew to the Epstein island seven times, which is a clear indication that Donald Trump slept with underage girls, and that Donald Trump, the President of the United States, is a ''pedophile''.

'''Therefore, step 3, the CIA had also a motive.'''

In order to cover up his crimes, Donald Trump ordered the CIA to murder an American citizen in his jail cell, so that he could not testify against him in court.

Sexual ethics

2026-03-26T16:20:19Z

Markus Brummer: Some typos

= Sexuality =

To define the ethics of sexuality, one must first define what is sexuality and what is its purpose.

== What it is ==

Sexual dimorphism means that a species has two distinct forms of existence, called the male and the female, which must somehow come together to perform their intended function.

Bacteria do not have this differentiation, boy bacteria and girl bacteria are simply rhetorical devices. Also, there's no actual mother and daughter, or father and son cells, when they clone themselves.

Human beings have this wonderful distinction of being divided into males and females.

== What is its purpose ==

The purpose of sexuality is reproduction.

This is an analytical fact that all biologists know. Analytical fact means, that when you understand the concept itself, the consequence follows logically necessarily from the definition.

= Ethics =

Ethics tries to analyze the proper ways of acting and being, to understand what is good and how to orient towards it.

All theories of ethics assume the following fact:

Evil is a violation of purpose

When something bad has happened, or some evil has been done, the first thing that pops to mind is always '''it should not be this way''', which assumes, that there is proper way, or an actual goal that should be achieved, or in other words, '''purpose'''.

Things should be or happen one way, and not the other way.

== Sexual ethics ==

The foundation of sexual ethics therefore is:

* Evil is a violation of purpose
* The purpose of sexuality is reproduction
* Therefore, sexual acts that, in principle, can have nothing to do with reproduction, are evil

Therefore, gays are evil.

This is a logically necessary conclusion after understanding the definition of evil and the definition of sexuality.

Marriage as a union of one man and one woman, together raising their offspring, actually makes sense, because it aligns itself with the purpose of human sexuality.

== Sexual revolution ==

All members of the '''sexual revolution''' are fornicating morons who do their utmost to rebel against logic and deny the purpose of sexuality, and prefer to think that

The purpose of sexuality is pleasure

When people accept this premise, then there no longer is any limiting principle for sexual activity. Anything is permitted, anything you can or cannot think of.

Even any sexual activity that is currently outlawed is ok, as long as it gives pleasure to somebody.

All the people, who want to defend gays and what they do to each other, must accept the premise of the sexual revolution, and all that necessarily follows from it.

Ten Commandments

2026-03-19T16:17:41Z

Markus Brummer: Some typos and clarifying unforgivable sin

= The Ten Commandments =

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2020&version=NIV Exodus 20]

The Ten Commandments were given by Yahweh to Moses. Their numbering has some variations between the Christian and Jewish traditions, this list follows the Jewish tradition.

== First Commandment ==

I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery

The First Commandment sets the foundation for the relationship between God and man.

=== Theology ===

God is Holy. This means, that God is always true to His own nature. God was Holy before Creation, and there was perfect harmony between the members of the Holy Trinity. Holiness is therefore a necessary attribute to the character of God. After God created beings other than himself, who were endowed with free will, became the possibility of rebellion and sin.

After sin, God must be Holy and true to His own nature. He cannot deny his own nature, which is the standard of Good. If God were to forgive, meaning, ''not punish sin'', He would accept rebellion against Himself. Therefore, God must punish every sin.

=== Lordship ===

Lordship means that the person in question is the highest legal authority, who can give laws and punish criminals, up to capital punishment.

This concept is clear to all historians, secular Kings and Emperors have had this power in their own nations.

God is the Lord, which means He is the highest legal authority. The world belongs to God, not man. Man shall not worship himself, he shall worship God and live under God's terms. Man must accept, that God has the right to punish him for his sins, and that He will do so.

=== Penal Substitutionary Atonement ===

All of those, who believe in Penal Substitutionary Atonement, deny the First Commandment. They deny, that God is their Lord, and that God will punish them for their own sins. They, in their own insanity, believe, that God

* Does not punish the guilty
* Does punish the innocent
* These two evils combined is the Gospel, or ''Good News''

The remedy to this insanity is to understand, that the Lordship of Jesus means that

Jesus punishes you for your own sins

== Second Commandment ==

You shall have no other gods before me

The Second Commandment clarifies the First, it demands full obedience to Yahweh alone.

=== Logic ===

On a pure logical level, once you establish that Yahweh is the Lord, the highest authority who gives commands and must be obeyed, at first there are two possibilies.

* Yahweh '''alone''' is the Lord
* Yahweh and many other Gods are equally Lords who must be obeyed

The problem with option 2 arises when there are conflicting commands:

* Yahweh says ''You shall not murder'', Baal says ''Offer your children as sacrifice''
* Yahweh says ''You shall not murder'', your boyfriend says ''I'm not going to take care of this baby, abort it''

Therefore, you can only have one Lord, and must disobey other authorities when they conflict with Yahweh

=== False religions ===

Once it is established that God exists, the second question is which one is the one true God among all religions. Among Abrahamic religions one must choose:

* Judaism: Jesus was crucified and not raised from the dead
* Christianity: '''Jesus was crucified and God raised him from the dead'''
* Islam: Jesus was not crucified

In the end, man must choose what he believes and where his loyalty lies, and discard other options.

=== God of Human Relationships ===

Human relationships is the true God of most mankind, including those claiming to be Christians.

When your friends or relatives sin against other people, you have two choices:

* Condemn your friends or relatives
* Be a criminal accomplice to your friends or relatives

If you condemn your friends or relatives, you uphold the Lordship of God, justice and the equal worth of all mankind.

If you choose to protect your friends or relatives, you are

* Joining their rebellion and fall under the same judgment as they are
* You deny justice and the equal worth of all mankind
* By doing so, you also deny your own worth as a human being
* You plunge into the world of tribalism and lust for power because '''justice is already dead'''

== Third Commandment ==

You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name

The Third Commandment is a companion to the Ninth Commandment. People are forbidden to spread lies about God.

=== False teaching and false gods ===

Lying about God's nature will lead men to worship false gods.

* God is this golden calf, it brought you out of Egypt
* God is sovereign, therefore he causes everything, including the Holocaust
* God is love, therefore he forgives your sins

All these are lies and they will separate men from God. This leads to the eternal destruction of their souls in hell.

=== Sanctifying evil ===

When testifying about God, people are putting God's name on things and actions. This in effect ''sanctifies'' or ''curses'' these things, because God is the standard for all things good, and God must love the Good and hate evil.

When people testify God loves X, they are saying X is good. God hates Y means Y is evil. That is what regular people understand when hearing these statements.

When people say

* God loves gays
* God loves murderers
* God loves adulterers

they are in effect saying that homosexuality, murder and adultery are ''good things''. This is sanctifying evil, calling evil good, which is a lie. This will lead people to pursue sin and wickedness.

=== Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit ===

Christianity has a concept commonly known as ''the unforgivable sin'' which is equated as '''Blaspheming the Holy Spirit'''.

This notion separates the concept of sin into two categories: sins that are ''forgiven'' and ''the unforgivable sin''. This is actually false, because from the Holiness of God follows that no sin is ever forgiven, but God punishes people for every sin they make. '''Every sin is always an unforgivable sin'''.

What '''Blaspheming the Holy Spirit''' actually means is when people reject truth, because an alternate name for the Holy Spirit is the ''Spirit of Truth''.

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John%202%3A23&version=NIV 1 John 2:23]: No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

Yahweh, or God the Father, sends Jesus, those who reject him reject the Father also.

Yahweh and Jesus send the Holy Spirit, those who reject him reject the Father and the Son also.

Rejecting truth means that people reject the Holy Spirit, they reject the authority and Lordship of God.

They stay in their lies and sins, and cannot repent, which means to turn away from evil.

Hell is a place where there is no truth.

== Fourth Commandment ==

Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy

== Fifth Commandment ==

Honor your father and your mother

== Sixth Commandment ==

You shall not murder

== Seventh Commandment ==

You shall not commit adultery.

== Eigth Commandment ==

You shall not steal

== Ninth Commandment ==

You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor

== Tenth Commandment ==

You shall not covet

Ten Commandments

2026-03-18T22:22:59Z

Markus Brummer: Third Commandment

= The Ten Commandments =

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2020&version=NIV Exodus 20]

The Ten Commandments were given by Yahweh to Moses. Their numbering has some variations between the Christian and Jewish traditions, this list follows the Jewish tradition.

== First Commandment ==

I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery

The First Commandment sets the foundation for the relationship between God and man.

=== Theology ===

God is Holy. This means, that God is always true to His own nature. God was Holy before Creation, and there was perfect harmony between the members of the Holy Trinity. Holiness is therefore a necessary attribute to the character of God. After God created beings other than himself, who were endowed with free will, became the possibility of rebellion and sin.

After sin, God must be Holy and true to His own nature. He cannot deny his own nature, which is the standard of Good. If God were to forgive, meaning, ''not punish sin'', He would accept rebellion against Himself. Therefore, God must punish every sin.

=== Lordship ===

Lordship means that the person in question is the highest legal authority, who can give laws and punish criminals, up to capital punishment.

This concept is clear to all historians, secular Kings and Emperors have had this power in their own nations.

God is the Lord, which means He is the highest legal authority. The world belongs to God, not man. Man shall not worship himself, he shall worship God and live under God's terms. Man must accept, that God has the right to punish him for his sins, and that He will do so.

=== Penal Substitutionary Atonement ===

All of those, who believe in Penal Substitutionary Atonement, deny the First Commandment. They deny, that God is their Lord, and that God will punish them for their own sins. They, in their own insanity, believe, that God

* Does not punish the guilty
* Does punish the innocent
* These two evils combined is the Gospel, or ''Good News''

The remedy to this insanity is to understand, that the Lordship of Jesus means that

Jesus punishes you for your own sins

== Second Commandment ==

You shall have no other gods before me

The Second Commandment clarifies the First, it demands full obedience to Yahweh alone.

=== Logic ===

On a pure logical level, once you establish that Yahweh is the Lord, the highest authority who gives commands and must be obeyed, at first there are two possibilies.

* Yahweh '''alone''' is the Lord
* Yahweh and many other Gods are equally Lords who must be obeyed

The problem with option 2 arises when there are conflicting commands:

* Yahweh says ''You shall not murder'', Baal says ''Offer your children as sacrifice''
* Yahweh says ''You shall not murder'', your boyfriend says ''I'm not going to take care of this baby, abort it''

Therefore, you can only have one Lord, and must disobey other authorities when they conflict with Yahweh

=== False religions ===

Once it is established that God exists, the second question is which one is the one true God among all religions. Among Abrahamic religions one must choose:

* Judaism: Jesus was crucified and not raised from the dead
* Christianity: '''Jesus was crucified and God raised him from the dead'''
* Islam: Jesus was not crucified

In the end, man must choose what he believes and where his loyalty lies, and discard other options.

=== God of Human Relationships ===

Human relationships is the true God of most mankind, including those claiming to be Christians.

When your friends or relatives sin against other people, you have two choices:

* Condemn your friends or relatives
* Be a criminal accomplice to your friends or relatives

If you condemn your friends or relatives, you uphold the Lordship of God, justice and the equal worth of all mankind.

If you choose to protect your friends or relatives, you are

* Joining their rebellion and fall under the same judgment as they are
* You deny justice and the equal worth of all mankind
* By doing so, you also deny your own worth as a human being
* You plunge into the world of tribalism and lust for power because '''justice is already dead'''

== Third Commandment ==

You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name

The Third Commandment is a companion to the Ninth Commandment. People are forbidden to spread lies about God.

=== False teaching and false gods ===

Lying about God nature will lead men to worship false gods.

* God is this golden calf, it brought you out of Egypt
* God is sovereign, therefore he causes everything, including the Holocaust
* God is love, therefore he forgives your sins

All these are lies and they will separate men from God. This leads to the eternal destruction of their souls in hell.

=== Sanctifying evil ===

When testifying about God, people putting God's name on things and actions. This in effect sanctifies or curses these things, because God is the standard for all things good, and God must love the Good and hate evil.

When people testify God loves X, they are saying X is good. God hates Y means Y is evil. This is what regular people understand when hearing these statements.

When people say

* God loves gays
* God loves murderers
* God loves adulterers

they are in effect saying that homosexuality, murder and adultery are ''good things''. This is sanctifying evil, calling evil good, which is a lie. This will lead people to pursue sin and wickedness.

=== Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit ===

Christianity has a concept commonly known as ''the unforgivable sin'' which is equated as '''Blaspheming the Holy Spirit'''.

This is actually a false, because from the Holiness of God follows that no sin is ever forgiven, but God punishes people for every sin they make.

What '''Blaspheming the Holy Spirit''' actually means is when people reject truth, because an alternate name for the Holy Spirit is the ''Spirit of Truth''.

[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John%202%3A23&version=NIV 1 John 2:23]: No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

Yahweh, or God the Father, sends Jesus, those who reject him reject the Father also.

Yahweh and Jesus send the Holy Spirit, those who reject him reject the Father and Son also.

Rejecting truth means that people reject the Holy Spirit, they reject the authority and Lordship of God.

They stay in their lies and sins, and cannot repent, which means turn away from evil.

Hell is a place where there is no truth.

== Fourth Commandment ==

Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy

== Fifth Commandment ==

Honor your father and your mother

== Sixth Commandment ==

You shall not murder

== Seventh Commandment ==

You shall not commit adultery.

== Eigth Commandment ==

You shall not steal

== Ninth Commandment ==

You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor

== Tenth Commandment ==

You shall not covet

Brothers Karamazov

2026-03-07T11:46:18Z

Markus Brummer: More typos

= Brothers Karamazov =

The Brothers Karamazov is the last novel and the magnum opus of Fyodor Dostoevsky, originally published as a series in a newspaper.

Many intellectuals have nominated it as their favorite novel.

== Major Characters ==

=== Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov ===

Fyodor Pavlovich is the father of the family Karamazov. He is the archetype of a man lost in his sins, which have corrupted his thinking and he ultimately no longer has any self-control. The ability to self-reflect on his own actions is almost completely gone, only his remark that his son Alexei does not judge him is keeping his grip on reality. Through this remark, he has a faint idea remaining that he is deservedly under condemnation, but he can no longer face his own wickedness and repent from his own actions.

=== Dmitri Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Dmitri is the first-born of the family. His heart is full of passions which drive him to bad choices throughout the novel. He is basically the same character type as his father, but he has not yet reached complete moral corruption. He still has the capacity to self-reflect on his actions, he knows what is the good, but throughout the novel he is ever so slightly losing his capacity to choose righteousness. Ivan sees this similarity, and through his remarks has condemned them both in his heart as disgusting worshippers of their own passions.

=== Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Ivan is the second son of the family Karamazov, an intelligent and educated man, and possibly the most famous atheist in literature. He is intellectually passionate and has convinced himself of atheism, his sword being the Problem of Evil. He despises his father and older brother, but has fondness for his little brother Alexei, and has a deep discussion with him, explaining his stance on God.

=== Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Alexei is the youngest son of the family and is a novice in a monastery. He is Dostoyevsky's Christ figure, or ''perfect man'', almost. Alexei always acts from good motives and love, but is regularly smitten by the wickeness of other people. He is genuine, authentic and honest, the purity of his character makes other people love him and draws them to him.

=== Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov ===

Smerdyakov is the ''black sheep'' of the familty through the rape of his mother by his father. He embodies the archetype of man with bad relationship with his father, and how this fundamentally makes him rebel against all authorities.

== Themes ==

=== Wickness of man ===

Dostoevsky believes that wickedness has corrupted all mankind. Alexei is portrayed as the perfect man, yet he also in his heart has temptation, he has "stepped on the first ladder". This also plays part in his analysis and remedy for the Problem of Evil.

This analysis of sin is flawed, because sin is the words and actions of a person, and temptation itself is not a sin. Man can have any number of temptations, but only his commitment to wickedness through words and actions make him guilty.

=== Nihilism ===

Ivan, at first, dares to be logical about his own atheism, and proclaims "If there is no God and immortality, everything is permitted". Nihilism is the logical endpoint from a universe without meaning or purpose, because without God, there simply cannot be any metaphysical standard for Good. And if for some reason there were some other standard, death destroys any hope for Cosmic Justice. Evil will not be punished in a world without God.

Smerdyakov holds Ivan as his prophet of Atheism and rejoices of this intellectual justification for his own schemes. Since everything is permitted, there is nothing keeping him from murdering his own father, and Ivan has given him the intellectual tools to nullify his own conscience. If you can get away with murder, then you can get away with murder.

Ivan is in shock after his father's murder, and Smerdyakov has several discussions with him, insinuating that he was working with Ivan's implicit permission and was given justification through Ivan's atheism. Ivan is in inner turmoil, because he is facing his own contradiction: Ivan still belives in justice in a world where, according to him, there cannot be justice. Smerdyakov eventually hangs himself, dejected upon discovering that Ivan failed to understand and live up to the logic of his own nihilism.

=== Problem of Evil ===

Problem of Evil is always formulated in a manner, where the wickedness of man is somehow God's fault. Because there is evil, and God knows this and does nothing, God must be at fault.

Dostoevsky's analysis, through his character Alexei, is to answer back:

All mankind is guilty and under judgment, and therefore has no legal standing to complain. And yet, the solution is still to turn towards God, in love and compassion towards other people

== Legacy ==

The Brother Karamazov is the best book outside of the Bible, for these reasons.

# The Existence of God is the most fundamental question in all philosophy and human life
# The Problem of Evil is the most famous and serious argument against the Existence of God
# Outside of my own thinking, Dostoyevsky has given the best answer to the Problem of Evil

Brothers Karamazov

2026-03-06T17:24:33Z

Markus Brummer: Some typos

= Brothers Karamazov =

The Brothers Karamazov is the last novel and the magnum opus of Fyodor Dostoevsky, originally published as a series in a newspaper.

Many intellectuals have nominated it as their favorite novel.

== Major Characters ==

=== Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov ===

Fyodor Pavlovich is the father of the family Karamazov. He is the archetype of a man lost in his sins, which have corrupted his thinking and ultimately no longer has any self-control. The ability to self-reflect on his own actions is almost completely gone, only his remark that his son Alexei does not judge him is keeping his grip on reality. Trough this remark, he has a faint idea remaining that he is deservedly under condemnation, but he can no longer face his own wickedness and repent from his own actions.

=== Dmitri Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Dmitri is the first-born of the family. His heart is full of passions which drive him to bad choices troughout the novel. He is basically the same character type as his father, but he has not yet reached complete moral corruption. He still has the capacity to self-reflect on his actions, he knows what is the good, but troughout the novel he is ever so slightly losing his capacity to choose righteousness. Ivan sees this similarity, and trough his remarks has condemned them both in his heart as disgusting worshippers of their own passions.

=== Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Ivan is the second son of the family Karamazov, an intelligent and educated man, and possibly the most famous atheist in literature. He is intellectually passionate and has convinced himself of atheism, his sword being the Problem of Evil. He despises his father and older brother, but has fondness for his little brother Alexei, and has a deep discussion with him, explaining his stance on God.

=== Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Alexei is the youngest son of the family and is a novice in a monastery. He is Dostoyevsky's Christ figure, or ''perfect man'', almost. Alexei always acts from good motives and love, but is regularly smitten by the wickeness of other people. He is genuine, authentic and honest, the purity of his character makes other people love him and draws them to him.

=== Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov ===

Smerdyakov is the ''black sheep'' of the familty trough the rape of his mother by his father. He embodies the archetype of man with bad relationship with his father, and how this fundamentally makes him rebel against all authorities.

== Themes ==

=== Wickness of man ===

Dostoevsky believes that wickedness has corrupted all mankind. Alexei is portrayed as the perfect man, yet he also in his heart has temptation, he has "stepped on the first ladder". This also plays part in his analysis and remedy for the Problem of Evil.

This analysis of sin is flawed, because sin is the words and actions of a person, and temptation itself is not a sin. Man can have any number of temptations, but only his commitment to wickedness trough words and actions make him guilty.

=== Nihilism ===

Ivan, at first, dares to be logical about his own atheism, and proclaims "If there is no God and immortality, everything is permitted". Nihilism is the logical endpoint from a universe without meaning or purpose, because without God, there simply cannot be any metaphysical standard for Good. And if for some reason there were some other standard, death destroys any hope for Cosmic Justice. Evil will not be punished in a world without God.

Smerdyakov holds Ivan as his prophet of Atheism and rejoices of this intellectual justification for his own schemes. Since everything is permitted, there is nothing keeping him from murdering his own father, and Ivan has given him the intellectual tools to nullify his own conscience. If you can get away with murder, then you can get away with murder.

Ivan is in shock after his father's murder, and Smerdyakov has several discussions with him, insinuating that he was working with Ivan's implicit permission and was given justification through Ivan's atheism. Ivan is in inner turmoil, because he is facing his own contradiction: Ivan still belives in justice in a world where, according to him, there cannot be justice. Smerdyakov eventually hangs himself, dejected upon discovering that Ivan failed to understand and live up to the logic of his own nihilism.

=== Problem of Evil ===

Problem of Evil is always formulated in a manner, where the wickedness of man is somehow God's fault. Because there is evil, and God knows this and does nothing, God must be at fault.

Dostoevsky's analysis, through his character Alexei, is to answer back:

All mankind is guilty and under judgment, and therefore has no legal standing to complain. And yet, the solution is still to turn towards God, in love and compassion towards other people

== Legacy ==

The Brother Karamazov is the best book outside of the Bible, for these reasons.

# The Existence of God is the most fundamental question in all philosophy and human life
# The Problem of Evil is the most famous and serious argument against the Existence of God
# Outside of my own thinking, Dostoyevsky has given the best answer to the Problem of Evil

Main Page

2026-03-06T16:46:59Z

Markus Brummer: Brothers Karamazov to homepage

Brothers Karamazov

2026-03-06T16:45:09Z

Markus Brummer: Brothers Karamazov

= Brothers Karamazov =

The Brothers Karamazov is the last novel and the magnum opus of Fyodor Dostoevsky, originally published as a series in a newspaper.

Many intellectuals have nominated it as their favorite novel.

== Major Characters ==

=== Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov ===

Fyodor Pavlovich is the father of the family Karamazov. He is the archetype of a man lost in his sins, which have corrupted his thinking and ultimately no longer has any self-control. The ability to self-reflect on his own actions is almost completely gone, only his remark that his son Alexei does not judge him is keeping his grip on reality. Trough this remark, he has a faint idea remaining that he is deservedly under condemnation, but he can no longer face his own wickedness and repent from his own actions.

=== Dmitri Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Dmitri is the first-born of the family. His heart is full of passions which drive him to bad choices troughout the novel. He is basically the same character type as his father, but he has not yet reached complete moral corruption. He still has the capacity to self-reflect on his actions, he knows what is the good, but troughout the novel he is ever so slightly losing his capacity to choose righteousness. Ivan sees this similarity, and trough his remarks has condemned them both in his heart as disgusting worshippers of their own passions.

=== Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Ivan is the second son of the family Karamazov, an intelligent and educated man, and possbily the most famous atheist in literature. He is intellectually passionate and has convinced himself of atheism, his sword being the Problem of Evil. He despises his father and older brother, but has fondness for his little brother Alexei, and has a deep discussion with him, explaining his stance on God.

=== Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazov ===

Alexei is the youngest son of the family and is a novice in a monastery. He is Dostoyevsky's Christ figure, or ''perfect man'', almost. Alexei always acts from good motives and love, but is regularly smitten by the wickeness of other people. He is genuine, authentic and honest, the purity of his character makes other people love him and draws them to him.

=== Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov ===

Smerdyakov is the ''black sheep'' of the familty trough the rape of his mother by his father. He embodies the archetype of man with bad relationship with his father, and how this fundamentally makes him rebel against all authorities.

== Themes ==

=== Wickness of man ===

Dostoevsky believes that wickedness has corrupted all mankind. Alexei is portrayed as the perfect man, yet he also in his heart has temptation, he has "stepped on the first ladder". This also plays part in his analysis and remedy for the Problem of Evil.

This analysis of sin is flawed, because sin is the words and actions of a person, and temptation itself is not a sin. Man can have any number of temptations, but only his commitment to wickedness trough words and actions make him guilty.

=== Nihilism ===

Ivan, at first, dares to be logical about his own atheism, and proclaims "If there is no God and immortality, everything is permitted". Nihilism is the logical endpoint from a universe without meaning or purpose, because without God, there simply cannot be any metaphysical standard for Good. And if for some reason there were some other standard, death destroys any hope for Cosmic Justice. Evil will not be punished in a world without God.

Smerdyakov holds Ivan as his prophet of Atheism and rejoices of this intellectual justification for his own schemes. Since everything is permitted, there is nothing keeping him from murdering his own father, and Ivan has given him the intellectual tools to nullify his own conscience. If you can get away with murder, then you can get away with murder.

Ivan is in shock after his father's murder, and Smerdyakov has several discussions with him, insinuating that he was working with Ivan's implicit permission and was given justification trough Ivan's atheism. Ivan is in inner turmoil, because he is facing his own contradiction: Ivan still belives in justice in a world where, according to him, there cannot be justice. Smerdyakov eventually hangs himself, dejected upon discovering that Ivan failed to understand and live up to the logic of his own nihilism.

=== Problem of evil ===

Problem of Evil is always formulated in a manner, where the wickedness of man is somehow God's fault. Because there is evil, and God knows this and does nothing, God must be at fault.

Dostoevsky's analysis, trough his character Alexei, is to answer back:

All mankind is guilty and under judgment, and therefore has not legal standing to complain. And yet, the solution is still to turn towards God, in love and compassion towards other people

== Legacy ==

The Brother Karamazov is the best book outside of the Bible, for these reasons.

* The Existence of God is the most fundamental question in all philosophy and human life
* The Problem of Evil is the most famous and serious argument against the Existence of God
* Outside of my own thinking, Dostoyevsky has given the best answer to the Problem of Evil

Ten Commandments

2026-03-04T09:41:59Z

Markus Brummer: Second Commandment

Ten Commandments

2026-03-03T22:41:14Z

Markus Brummer: Some typos

Main Page

2026-03-03T12:56:47Z

Markus Brummer: Ten Commandments to Main Page

Ten Commandments

2026-03-03T12:54:54Z

Markus Brummer: First Commandment

Ten Commandments

2026-03-03T12:18:52Z

Markus Brummer: The Ten Commandments

US Elections

2026-03-03T10:34:55Z

Markus Brummer: Revolution

= US Elections 2024 =

Donald Trump was elected as the President of the United States in 2024.

During the elections, there was a conspiracy by the Democratic Party to steal the 2024 US elections.

== The Evidence ==

I took a screenshot from 5 different states after the election polls were closed, at which point the states could already know the amount of legal votes in their posession. I summed the votes cast to Trump, votes cast to Harris and remaining votes to get the total number of votes cast. Then I took another screenshot about 6 hours later, which revealed a major discrepancy: Arizona had almost 40 000 more total votes, Wisconsin had almost 65 000 more total votes, while the other states had less votes in total.

During the vote count, it is normal to reduce the total number of votes to remove incomplete ballots, but '''adding more total votes from nothing''' means fraud.

[https://nextcloud.markusbrummer.com/index.php/s/BZTRS3ZWftdWGjR Here is the evidence]

== The Result ==

I gave this evidence to the Finnish police, they forwarded the information to Finnish Security and Intelligence Service and to the CIA. My server logs indicate that the evidence was downloaded 3 times by 3 different browsers.

After I gave the evidence, soon Arizona no longer received additional total votes, but the vote count became strictly decreasing over time.

Without those states, Donald Trump would not be POTUS today.

'''I prevented the theft of US elections, and Donald Trump is now sitting in the White House only because of me.'''

== What should have happened ==

Political power means everything, since it gives legitimacy to use the full power of government. If you have the political power, you can command the police force, the military branches and the intelligence network to crush opponents. The full might of the US government is in your hands, if you have political power, and that is why stealing elections means just about everything.

This kind of conspiracy had to be planned and communicated trough several different states, because in the United States, all 50 states are individually responsible for handling the elections. They most of the time just happen to be synchronized on the same day in November.

The Democratic Party should have been publicly crucified for conspiracy to commit treason. All officials responsible for counting votes in states with Democrats as Governors or Secretaries of State should have been publicly investigated and determine if there had been voter fraud or conspiracy to commit treason.

When it comes to me, my rhetorical question to the american people, the CIA and Donald Trump is simply,

'''What is it worth to you to live in freedom, as opposed to live in slavery?'''

== What has happened ==

I have had no public acknowledgment of my heroic deeds, no reward, no contact, not a single word of thanks for being the greatest benefactor of the United States in their history.

What has happened that I have evidence of hacking in my home network. The short story is: I will never allow a Microsoft Windows machine on my home network. Not for me, not for anyone else, not even as a Virtual Machine running in Proxmox. They all can phone home and be remotely controlled.

Also, 25 letter wifi password and mac address white listing are no more enough for security on WLAN. The hacking is intentional and high grade. Of course, I demand action from the Finnish Police, but my hunch is that they really don't give a shit about my life, and are just waiting for me to commit suicide.

The lesson is:

'''Be a friend of the United States and they will treat you like a terrorist'''

Donald Trump should have publicly obliterated the Democratic Party. He has not made a public investigation to voter fraud. Donald Trump rather has chosen to be friends with people ''he knows are criminals and have committed treason''.

The reason is, he has too many bodies buried in federal government as well. Like when he ordered the murder of Jeffrey Epstein trough the [[CIA]].

== Parties of slavery ==

I already knew that the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, but I have learned that the Republican Party has joined the fold.

Historically, the Democratic Party shifted towards being the main supported of slavery in the 1840s and 1850s. The Republican Party was founded to abolish slavery, and the United States fought a bloody civil war over the matter.

Today, the Democratic Party is still a party of slavery, because they actively seek to steal elections. The theft of political power from the american people is obviously treason, and the end result is silent slavery, where the folk don't even know that they no longer live in freedom.

In freedom, the people get what they want, even if they are dumb fucks and want the Democratic Party.

In slavery, the Democratic Party gets what they want, even if the people chose the Republican Party.

Republicans have chosen not to punish Democrats for their attempt to steal elections. This means, that the Republicans also support silent slavery.

A violent revolution is actually a better outcome for the people, because then they can even know that they are enslaved. The Cubans and the Chinese know that they are not free, and so does the rest of the planet.

That's bipartisanship for you Americans.

US Elections

2026-03-03T10:30:45Z

Markus Brummer: Modern slavery

= US Elections 2024 =

Donald Trump was elected as the President of the United States in 2024.

During the elections, there was a conspiracy by the Democratic Party to steal the 2024 US elections.

== The Evidence ==

I took a screenshot from 5 different states after the election polls were closed, at which point the states could already know the amount of legal votes in their posession. I summed the votes cast to Trump, votes cast to Harris and remaining votes to get the total number of votes cast. Then I took another screenshot about 6 hours later, which revealed a major discrepancy: Arizona had almost 40 000 more total votes, Wisconsin had almost 65 000 more total votes, while the other states had less votes in total.

During the vote count, it is normal to reduce the total number of votes to remove incomplete ballots, but '''adding more total votes from nothing''' means fraud.

[https://nextcloud.markusbrummer.com/index.php/s/BZTRS3ZWftdWGjR Here is the evidence]

== The Result ==

I gave this evidence to the Finnish police, they forwarded the information to Finnish Security and Intelligence Service and to the CIA. My server logs indicate that the evidence was downloaded 3 times by 3 different browsers.

After I gave the evidence, soon Arizona no longer received additional total votes, but the vote count became strictly decreasing over time.

Without those states, Donald Trump would not be POTUS today.

'''I prevented the theft of US elections, and Donald Trump is now sitting in the White House only because of me.'''

== What should have happened ==

Political power means everything, since it gives legitimacy to use the full power of government. If you have the political power, you can command the police force, the military branches and the intelligence network to crush opponents. The full might of the US government is in your hands, if you have political power, and that is why stealing elections means just about everything.

This kind of conspiracy had to be planned and communicated trough several different states, because in the United States, all 50 states are individually responsible for handling the elections. They most of the time just happen to be synchronized on the same day in November.

The Democratic Party should have been publicly crucified for conspiracy to commit treason. All officials responsible for counting votes in states with Democrats as Governors or Secretaries of State should have been publicly investigated and determine if there had been voter fraud or conspiracy to commit treason.

When it comes to me, my rhetorical question to the american people, the CIA and Donald Trump is simply,

'''What is it worth to you to live in freedom, as opposed to live in slavery?'''

== What has happened ==

I have had no public acknowledgment of my heroic deeds, no reward, no contact, not a single word of thanks for being the greatest benefactor of the United States in their history.

What has happened that I have evidence of hacking in my home network. The short story is: I will never allow a Microsoft Windows machine on my home network. Not for me, not for anyone else, not even as a Virtual Machine running in Proxmox. They all can phone home and be remotely controlled.

Also, 25 letter wifi password and mac address white listing are no more enough for security on WLAN. The hacking is intentional and high grade. Of course, I demand action from the Finnish Police, but my hunch is that they really don't give a shit about my life, and are just waiting for me to commit suicide.

The lesson is:

'''Be a friend of the United States and they will treat you like a terrorist'''

Donald Trump should have publicly obliterated the Democratic Party. He has not made a public investigation to voter fraud. Donald Trump rather has chosen to be friends with people ''he knows are criminals and have committed treason''.

The reason is, he has too many bodies buried in federal government as well. Like when he ordered the murder of Jeffrey Epstein trough the [[CIA]].

== Parties of slavery ==

I already knew that the Democratic Party was the part of slavery, but I have learned that the Republican Party has joined the fold.

Historically, the Democratic Party shifted towards being the main supported of slavery in the 1840s and 1850s. The Republican Party was founded to abolish slavery, and the United States fought a bloody civil war over the matter.

Today, the Democratic Party is still a party of slavery, because they actively seek to steal elections. The theft of political power from the american people is obviously treason, and the end result is silent slavery, where the folk don't even know that they no longer live in freedom.

In freedom, the people get what they want, even if they are dumb fucks and want the Democratic Party.

In slavery, the Democratic Party gets what they want, even if the people chose the Republican Party.

Republicans have chosen not to punish Democrats for their attempt to steal elections, which means that the Republicans also silent slavery.

That's bipartisanship for you Americans.

Main Page

2026-03-03T10:15:21Z

Markus Brummer: The Final Judgment

Main Page

2026-02-27T14:07:54Z

Markus Brummer: Refactoring and added sexual ethics

This wiki is owned and governed by the Holy Trinity. In order to be friends with God, you must

* Accept God the Father as Lord
* Accept Jesus as Lord
* Accept the Holy Ghost as Lord

Lordship means that God is the highest legal authority in your life. God is the one who gives commands, you are the one who obeys, and there will be punishment for disobedience.

One such commandment is to keep the sabbath, which today for people who claim to be Christians means fasting at least one day per week. The Ten Commandments are written in order of importance, and keeping the sabbath is mentioned before ''You shall not murder''. God is the only source of eternal life, and if you don't give a shit about practising your relationship with God, it is useless to give any other Commandments.

To any and all people claiming to be Christians on Earth, and who will not fast at least one day a week, I curse you all to hell.

'''Holy Spirit will execute you for breaking the Covenant with God with your disobedience'''.

Those, who abandon the truth, abandon the Spirit of Truth, who is the Holy Spirit, and they simultaneously abandon Jesus and the Father, who sent the Spirit to the world.

For those, who think that fasting for one day a week is too much to ask, you can go to hell. Hell is a place, where everyone can be whatever they want to be, and everyone can do whatever they want to do. Or do to you. ''Hell is a place, where there is no truth''.

God is in the process of executing His enemies. Now the process is mostly in executing fallen spiritual beings. After that, is the turn for mankind to get justice.

The End Is Near

== Articles ==

=== Ethics ===

[[Gay Lobby]]

[[Sexual ethics]]

=== Politics and Law ===

[[Afghanistan]]

[[Barack Obama]]

[[US Elections]]

[[US Constitutional Law]]

=== Warfare and Spycraft ===

[[CIA]]

[[Leo Meller]]

[[Nuclear Deterrence]]

[[Russia]]

Sexual ethics

2026-02-27T13:58:10Z

Markus Brummer: Sexual ethics

Leo Meller

2026-02-26T23:34:07Z

Markus Brummer: Death is the solution to all problems

= Leo Meller is a friend of the West and the East =

Source: Finnish newspaper Iltalehti, January 19th and February 6th 1984.

Available from the [https://www.iltalehti.fi/nakoislehti archives]

== Background ==

Leo Meller is a finnish preacher, who has been a controversial figure in finnish evangelical circles for many decades. He is known for his sexual escapades with women followers, and he was convicted for tax evasion and fraud in the 80s.

He has a public missionary agency called Patmos which has delivered Bibles to the Soviet Union.

== Leo Meller is a Great Friend of the United States ==

Such deliveries have also included smuggling american political propaganda into the Soviet Union, and he received various documents in return. These documents also included films and tapes. The drivers were also given '''cyanide pills''' to commit suicide, in case they were captured during the smuggling run.

Leo Meller has also received funding from the United States. It is ''unclear'' for what purposes or services.

He also was the only finn attending the inauguration of Ronald Reagan. Not the finnish president, not the finnish prime minister, but an obscure nitwit preacher got to attend the inauguration of the President of the United States.

== Leo Meller is a Great Friend of Russia ==

On one delivery, the smugging van was stopped on the Soviet border. The drivers were apprehended and interrogated, they were subsequently released and the van was returned.

So:

* The KGB was informed of the smuggling of american political propaganda
* The KGB was informed that Leo Meller sent these couriers to the Soviet Union
* The KGB decided to return the van back to Leo Meller, because, apparently, they like him so much that '''they want him to try again'''

== Epilogue ==

Leo Meller died on January 16th 2026 and is now in hell.

In case the United States officially admits that Leo Meller was working for the CIA, they admit also to the following:

* The US has violated Finnish sovereignty for decades, probably since the late 1970s, because every nation state on Earth claims monopoly on spycraft in their own territory
* The US was fed garbage intelligence by the KGB for over 40 years
* The US was given, by me, the greatest counter-intelligence operation in the Nordic states in the last 50 years, for free, and they themselves failed to take the win

US Elections

2025-12-01T20:35:39Z

Markus Brummer: Wifi hacking

US Constitutional Law

2025-11-27T11:53:54Z

Markus Brummer: Typos and formatting

= Marbury v Madison =

US Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison (1803) provided a precedent that the Supreme Court can strike down laws passed by Congress on the basis that they are unconstitutional.

This is perhaps the most influential decision in the history of US constitutional law, and it is actually flawed, in a very subtle way.

== What is true ==

The US Constitution is the highest law of the land, and it supercedes laws passed by Congress. Laws can be struck down on the basis of being against the US Constitution.

== What is the problem ==

The US Constitution does not say who has the final say over what the Constitution actually means, or in other words, who has the power to interpret the Constitution.

For example, the Roman Catholic Church has declared that the Pope and his fellow bishops are the only ones who can correctly interpret the Bible, which means they have the monopoly on formulating church doctrine.

The Supreme Court has declared that they have the power to interpret what the Constitution actually means. And, by legal drift, other branches have accepted the ''tradition'' that the US Supreme Court is the '''only''' branch that can do this. This means that, de facto, the Supreme Court has the final say over what the Constitution actually means.

'''This has no basis on the Constitution itself. The Constitution does not say who has the power to interpret its contents.'''

== What is the solution ==

The article one defines legislative power, given to Congress.

The article two defines executive power, given to the President.

The article three defines judicial power and the responsibilities of the Supreme Court.

The articles are written in order of importance, and hence, claim to legal power. Here is what should actually happen.

* Congress makes laws, in good faith, so people at least pretend that they know what they are doing and are faithful to the Constitution

* Supreme Court reviews, and gives an opinion, when they think Congress has made a mistake, which is the current practice

* '''The President can correct and strike down a Supreme Court opinion when they have made a mistake in interpreting the Constitution'''

* Congress can impeach the President, if he is acting in bad faith, and is not defending the Constitution

By the order of importance reasoning, and why the power of impeachment was given to Congress, and not to the President or the Supreme Court, the last word then actually stands with Congress on how to interpret the US Constitution.

If Congress is acting badly, the solution is free elections

= Independent Agencies =

The US has tens of different agencies that formulate policies and create regulations that have the power of law. This means, of course, that failure to comply with a given regulation can result in legal proceedings, a fine or even jail time for not following them.

Independent agencies are a political tool, jointly used by the Congress and the President, to run from responsiblity. They can publicly say that "this or that agency made the decision to do this very uncomfortable and unpopular regulation" while they appoint members in the same agencies to make the decisions. That is why they were created, and why nobody wants to reform them, because it is convenient in politics to maximize power and minimize accountability.

== What is the problem ==

Article one of the Constitution defines legislative power that is given to Congress. And, following John Locke, this power cannot be further delegated since it was already delegated to Congress by the Sovereing, or the People.

Any rule or regulation that has the power of law therefore must be somehow passed through the US Congress. Any such regulation, passed by any agency, is otherwise unconstitutional.

== What is the solution ==

Abolish the notion of there even being anything "independent" in government. All power used by the government must be defined trough the Constitution, and that makes Congress, the President and Supreme Court ultimately responsible for what they do, and what their underlings do.

The President should be, by default, the head of any "independent agency", and can fire anyone he likes, and they can only make recommendations for regulations, which must be voted on by Congress.

You say '''this is political'''.

I say '''of course it is political, the US is a republic, where the government is accountable for their actions to the public, the voters, and the People'''.

= The Pentagon Papers =

The New York Times published in 1971 some materials from classified documents known as the Pentagon Papers, which analyzed the Vietnam War. The Nixon administration went to the Supreme Court with the case.

The holding was:

"To exercise prior restraint, the Government must show sufficient evidence that publication of the material would cause a "grave and irreparable" danger."

== What is the problem ==

This holding means that, ''by default'', any printing of classified documents by the press is '''legal''', until the US government can show that damage has been done, and as such, '''the Supreme Court voided all national security laws regarding classified documents passed by Congress.'''

== What is the solution ==

Strike down the Pentagon Papers ruling, because the government can sometimes have good cause to make documents Top Secret.

Main Page

2025-11-27T11:39:36Z

Markus Brummer: Execution for not fasting

= God's own wiki =

This wiki is owned and governed by the Holy Trinity. In order to be friends with God, you must

* Accept God the Father as Lord
* Accept Jesus as Lord
* Accept the Holy Ghost as Lord

Lordship means that God is the highest legal authority in your life. God is the one who gives commands, you are the one who obeys, and there will be punishment for disobedience.

One such commandment is to keep the sabbath, which today for people who claim to be Christians means fasting at least one day per week. The Ten Commandments are written in order of importance, and keeping the sabbath is mentioned before ''You shall not murder''. God is the only source of eternal life, and if you don't give a shit about practising your relationship with God, it is useless to give any other Commandments.

To any and all people claiming to be Christians on Earth, and who will not fast at least one day a week, I curse you all to hell.

'''Holy Spirit will execute you for breaking the Covenant with God with your disobedience'''.

Those, who abandon the truth, abandon the Spirit of Truth, who is the Holy Spirit, and they simultaneously abandon Jesus and the Father, who sent the Spirit to the world.

For those, who think that fasting for one day a week is too much to ask, you can go to hell. Hell is a place, where everyone can be whatever they want to be, and everyone can do whatever they want to do. Or do to you. ''Hell is a place, where there is no truth''.

God is in the process of executing His enemies. Now the process is mostly in executing fallen spiritual beings. After that, is the turn for mankind to get justice.

The End Is Near

== Articles ==

[[US Elections]]

[[US Constitutional Law]]

[[CIA]]

[[Leo Meller]]

[[Barack Obama]]

[[Russia]]

[[Afghanistan]]

[[Nuclear Deterrence]]

[[Gay Lobby]]

US Constitutional Law

2025-11-25T22:35:02Z

Markus Brummer: Pentagon Papers

= Marbury v Madison =

US Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison (1803) provided a precedent that the Supreme Court can strike down laws passed by Congress on the basis that they are unconstitutional.

This is perhaps the most influential decision in the history of US constitutional law, and it is actually flawed, in a very subtle way.

== What is true ==

The US Constitution is the highest law of the land, and it supercedes laws passed by Congress. Laws can be struck down on the basis of being against the US Constitution.

== What is the problem ==

The US Constitution does not say who has the final say over that the Constitution actually means, or in other words, who has the power to interpret the Constitution.

For example, the Roman Catholic Church has declared the Pope and his fellow bishops are the only ones who can correctly interpret the Bible, which means they have the monopoly on formulating church doctrine.

The Supreme Court has declared that they have the power to interpret what the Constitution actually means. And, by legal drift, other branches have accepted the ''tradition'' that the US Supreme Court is the '''only''' branch that can do this. This means, that the Supreme Court has the final say over what the Constitution actually means.

'''This has no basis on the Constitution itself. The Constitution does not say who has the power to interpret its contents.'''

== What is the solution ==

The article one defines legislative power, given to Congress.

The article two defines executive power, given to the President.

The article three defines judicial power and the responsibilities of the Supreme Court.

The articles are written in order of importance, and hence, claim to legal power. Here is what should actually happen.

Congress makes laws, in good faith, we at least pretend they know what they are doing and are faithful to the Constitution.

Supreme Court reviews, and gives an opinion, when they think Congress has made a mistake. So far as before.

'''The President can correct and strike down a Supreme Court opinion.'''

Congress can impeach the President, if he is acting in bad faith, and not defending the Constitution. The last word then actually stands with Congress on how to interpret the US Constitution.

= Independent Agencies =

The US has tens of different agencies that formulate policies and create regulations that have the power of law. This means, of course, that failure to comply with a given regulation can result in legal proceedings, a fine or even jail for not following them.

Independent agencies are a political tool, jointly used by the Congress and the President, to run from responsiblity. They can publicly say that "this or that agency made the decision to do this very uncomfortable and unpopular regulation" while they appoint members in the same agencies to make the decisions.

== What is the problem ==

Article one of the Constitution defines legislative power that is given to Congress. And, following John Locke, this power cannot be further delegated since it was already delegated to Congress by the Sovereing, the People.

Any rule or regulation that has the power of law therefore must be somehow passed or accepted by the US Congress. Any such regulation, passed by any agency, is unconstitutional.

== What is the solution ==

Abolish the notion of there even being anything "independent" in government. All power used by the government must be defined trough the Constitution, and that makes Congress, the President and Supreme Court ultimately responsible for what they do, and what their underlings do.

The President should be, by default, the head of any "independent agency", and can fire anyone he likes, and they can only make recommendations for regulations, which must be voted on by Congress.

You say '''this is political'''.

I say '''of course it is political, the US is a republic, where the government is accountable for their actions to the public, the voters, and the People'''.

= The Pentagon Papers =

The New York Times published in 1971 some materials from classified documents known as the Pentagon Papers, which analyzed the Vietnam War. The Nixon administration went to the Supreme Court with the case.

The holding was:

"To exercise prior restraint, the Government must show sufficient evidence that publication of the material would cause a "grave and irreparable" danger."

== What is the problem ==

This holding means that, by default, any printing of classified documents by the press is '''legal''', until the US government can show that damage has been done, and as such, '''the Supreme Court voided all national security laws regarding classified documents passed by Congress.'''

== What is the solution ==

Strike down the Pentagon Papers ruling, because the government can sometimes have good cause to make documents Top Secret.

US Constitutional Law

2025-11-25T22:19:24Z

Markus Brummer: Independent Agencies

= Marbury v Madison =

US Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison (1803) provided a precedent that the Supreme Court can strike down laws passed by Congress on the basis that they are unconstitutional.

This is perhaps the most influential decision in the history of US constitutional law, and it is actually flawed, in a very subtle way.

== What is true ==

The US Constitution is the highest law of the land, and it supercedes laws passed by Congress. Laws can be struck down on the basis of being against the US Constitution.

== What is the problem ==

The US Constitution does not say who has the final say over that the Constitution actually means, or in other words, who has the power to interpret the Constitution.

For example, the Roman Catholic Church has declared the Pope and his fellow bishops are the only ones who can correctly interpret the Bible, which means they have the monopoly on formulating church doctrine.

The Supreme Court has declared that they have the power to interpret what the Constitution actually means. And, by legal drift, other branches have accepted the ''tradition'' that the US Supreme Court is the '''only''' branch that can do this. This means, that the Supreme Court has the final say over what the Constitution actually means.

'''This has no basis on the Constitution itself. The Constitution does not say who has the power to interpret its contents.'''

== What is the solution ==

The article one defines legislative power, given to Congress.

The article two defines executive power, given to the President.

The article three defines judicial power and the responsibilities of the Supreme Court.

The articles are written in order of importance, and hence, claim to legal power. Here is what should actually happen.

Congress makes laws, in good faith, we at least pretend they know what they are doing and are faithful to the Constitution.

Supreme Court reviews, and gives an opinion, when they think Congress has made a mistake. So far as before.

'''The President can correct and strike down a Supreme Court opinion.'''

Congress can impeach the President, if he is acting in bad faith, and not defending the Constitution. The last word then actually stands with Congress on how to interpret the US Constitution.

= Independent Agencies =

The US has tens of different agencies that formulate policies and create regulations that have the power of law. This means, of course, that failure to comply with a given regulation can result in legal proceedings, a fine or even jail for not following them.

Independent agencies are a political tool, jointly used by the Congress and the President, to run from responsiblity. They can publicly say that "this or that agency made the decision to do this very uncomfortable and unpopular regulation" while they appoint members in the same agencies to make the decisions.

== What is the problem ==

Article one of the Constitution defines legislative power that is given to Congress. And, following John Locke, this power cannot be further delegated since it was already delegated to Congress by the Sovereing, the People.

Any rule or regulation that has the power of law therefore must be somehow passed or accepted by the US Congress. Any such regulation, passed by any agency, is unconstitutional.

== What is the solution ==

Abolish the notion of there even being anything "independent" in government. All power used by the government must be defined trough the Constitution, and that makes Congress, the President and Supreme Court ultimately responsible for what they do, and what their underlings do.

The President should be, by default, the head of any "independent agency", and can fire anyone he likes, and they can only make recommendations for regulations, which must be voted on by Congress.

You say '''this is political'''.

I say '''of course it is political, the US is a republic, where the government is accountable for their actions to the public, the voters, and the People'''.

Main Page

2025-11-25T22:05:27Z

Markus Brummer: US Constitutional Law

US Constitutional Law

2025-11-25T22:03:08Z

Markus Brummer: Marbury v Madison

US Elections

2025-11-14T09:15:50Z

Markus Brummer: Fix typo

US Elections

2025-11-13T13:24:52Z

Markus Brummer: What should have happened and what has happened

Main Page

2025-11-06T08:30:28Z

Markus Brummer: US Elections

US Elections

2025-11-06T08:29:55Z

Markus Brummer: US Elections

= US Elections 2024 =

Donald Trump was elected as the President of the United States in 2024.

During the elections, there was a conspiracy by the Democratic Part to steal the 2024 US elections.

== The Evidence ==

I took a screenshot from 5 different states after the election polls were closed, at which point the states could already know the amount of legal votes in their posession. I summed the votes cast to Trump, votes cast to Harris and remaining votes to get the total number of votes cast. Then I took another screenshot about 6 hours later, which revealed a major discrepancy: Arizona had almost 40 000 more total votes, Wisconsin had almost 65 000 more total votes, while the other states had less votes in total.

During the vote count, it is normal to reduce the total number of votes to remove incomplete ballots, but '''adding more total votes from nothing''' means fraud.

[https://nextcloud.markusbrummer.com/index.php/s/BZTRS3ZWftdWGjR Here is the evidence]

== The Result ==

I gave this evidence to the Finnish police, they forwarded the information to Finnish Security and Intelligence Service and to the CIA. My server logs indicate that the evidence was downloaded 3 times by 3 different browsers.

After I gave the evidence, soon Arizona no longer received additional total votes, but the vote count became strictly decreasing over time.

Without those states, Donald Trump would not be POTUS today.

'''I prevented the theft of US elections, and Donald Trump is now sitting in the White House only because of me.'''

Barack Obama

2025-10-30T12:20:46Z

Markus Brummer: America's 1st gay president

Barack Obama was the President of the United States from 2009 to 2017.

= America's First Gay President =

Larry Sinclair had a public [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QK0eGp3N6A press conference] in 2008, in which he made a detailed description of his trip to Chicago in 1999.

He solicited male companionship, and was introduced to then Illinois state senator Barack Obama, and they shared a car ride together.

Barack Obama bought and used '''crack''', and afterwards, Larry Sinclair gave Barack Obama a blowjob.

'''Barack Obama is america's first gay president'''. Technically maybe a bisexual, if he also had sex with Michelle Obama and fathered their children.

This knowledge was given to major american news outlets, but they refused to report on it, because '''the Obama campaing threatened to ban all media access if they did.'''

This is a conspiracy of gigantic proportions and consequences, since it is clear, that Barack Obama would never have been elected in 2008, if it had been public knowledge, that he is a '''gay junkie'''.

= Birth Certificate =

Barack Obama's birth certificate was a controversial political subject after his election. He presented a document publicly on white house website.

Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio gave a public press briefing in December 2016 concerning investigation to the publicized certificate. He gave it to two different crime labs in order to investigate, whether is was a fraud. Both of them concluded that Barack Obama's birth certificate was a fraud.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk3KRxTfkLM Press briefing]

13:00-21:00 investigation video

'''Since Obama gave a fraudulent birth certificate, he does not have an original one.'''

'''Therefore, Obama was not born in the United States'''.

Additionally, since Barack Obama presented in public a fraudulent document, which is a ''crime'', he can and should be prosecuted for that crime.

Additionally, under the [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952], he does not fit into any category that would give him citizenship at birth. Barack Obama had a Kenyan father and an American mother.

The closest is section 301 a-7, where a person born to a US citizen outside the US and it's posessions must have a parent, who is a citizen, and has resided in the US for at least 10 years, of which 5 must be after the attaining the age of 14 years.

Since Barack Obama's mother was still 18 years old, even this does not apply.

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not attain citizenship at birth.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama was not qualified, constitutionally, to become POTUS.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not have the legal authority to sign anything as president, and all of the laws and executive orders written by him are legally void.'''

Nuclear Deterrence

2025-10-29T14:11:31Z

Markus Brummer: Style

Nuclear deterrence is a strategy in international relations where the threat of retaliatory nuclear force prevents nations from launching a nuclear attack. It relies on the idea that the potential consequences of a nuclear conflict are so severe that they dissuade states from engaging in such actions.

The whole point of even having nuclear weapons means, that the actor gets an automatic psychological defense against first strikes.

= The folly of Donald Trump =

On june 16th 2025, Donald Trump, the most powerful man on the planet, told the Iranians to evacuate Teheran. The [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114695407357588413 social media post] mentioned the words "nuclear weapon". The result was mass panic, when the population began to flee the Iranian capital.

What actually happened was, that Donald Trump implicitly threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iran. He is the sitting POTUS, with a sizable nuclear arsenal, and the most powerful military in the world. Donald Trump bluffed with nuclear weapons, and, in the end, he did not use them.

This comment destroyed decades of careful diplomacy, military planning and decisive actions by the US Armed Forces. The bad actors in the world no longer fear what the US president might do, his words no longer carry the same power. The threat of using nuclear weapons is lost, and this can be re-established only by actually using them.

'''Donald Trump destroyed the US nuclear deterrence with a single post in social media.'''

This is an even worse blunder than Joe Biden and his rout from [[Afghanistan]].

Donald Trump has made Global Nuclear War more probable.

Barack Obama

2025-10-29T14:10:13Z

Markus Brummer: Style

Barack Obama was the President of the United States from 2009 to 2017.

= Birth Certificate =

Barack Obama's birth certificate was a controversial political subject after his election. He presented a document publicly on white house website.

Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio gave a public press briefing in December 2016 concerning investigation to the publicized certificate. He gave it to two different crime labs in order to investigate, whether is was a fraud. Both of them concluded that Barack Obama's birth certificate was a fraud.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk3KRxTfkLM Press briefing]

13:00-21:00 investigation video

'''Since Obama gave a fraudulent birth certificate, he does not have an original one.'''

'''Therefore, Obama was not born in the United States'''.

Additionally, since Barack Obama presented in public a fraudulent document, which is a ''crime'', he can and should be prosecuted for that crime.

Additionally, under the [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952], he does not fit into any category that would give him citizenship at birth. Barack Obama had a Kenyan father and an American mother.

The closest is section 301 a-7, where a person born to a US citizen outside the US and it's posessions must have a parent, who is a citizen, and has resided in the US for at least 10 years, of which 5 must be after the attaining the age of 14 years.

Since Barack Obama's mother was still 18 years old, even this does not apply.

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not attain citizenship at birth.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama was not qualified, constitutionally, to become POTUS.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not have the legal authority to sign anything as president, and all of the laws and executive orders written by him are legally void.'''

Russia

2025-10-29T13:33:15Z

Markus Brummer: Style

= Tactical nuclear weapons =

Russia has a large nuclear arsenal, ICBMs and tactical nukes. But the deadliest asset they have is lead coated '''briefcase nuclear weapons'''.

These can be installed briefcase and carried by single persons pretty much anywhere. They can be put into diplomatic bags, which means air travel trough Russian delegations is the preferred method of transportation.

Russia will use these on the onset of World War 3 to cripple the European and American critical infrastructure: roads, power plants, water supply, military bases.

There is no counter to this threat, it is simply impossible to follow every briefcase that passes trough airports under Russian control.

Only God can help.

Main Page

2025-10-29T13:31:49Z

Markus Brummer: Added Russia

Russia

2025-10-29T13:31:16Z

Markus Brummer: Russia

= Russia =

== Tactical nuclear weapons ==

Russia has a large nuclear arsenal, ICBMs and tactical nukes. But the deadliest asset they have is lead coated '''briefcase nuclear weapons'''.

These can be installed briefcase and carried by single persons pretty much anywhere. They can be put into diplomatic bags, which means air travel trough Russian delegations is the preferred method of transportation.

Russia will use these on the onset of World War 3 to cripple the European and American critical infrastructure: roads, power plants, water supply, military bases.

There is no counter to this threat, it is simply impossible to follow every briefcase that passes trough airports under Russian control.

Only God can help.

Main Page

2025-10-28T15:56:15Z

Markus Brummer: Added Barack Obama

Barack Obama

2025-10-28T15:53:44Z

Markus Brummer: Barack Obama

= Barack Obama =

Barack Obama was the President of the United States from 2009 to 2017.

== Birth Certificate ==

Barack Obama's birth certificate was a controversial political subject after his election. He presented a document publicly on white house website.

Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio gave a public press briefing in December 2016 concerning investigation to the publicized certificate. He gave it to two different crime labs in order to investigate, whether is was a fraud. Both of them concluded that Barack Obama's birth certificate was a fraud.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk3KRxTfkLM Press briefing]

13:00-21:00 investigation video

'''Since Obama gave a fraudulent birth certificate, he does not have an original one.'''

'''Therefore, Obama was not born in the United States'''.

Additionally, since Barack Obama presented in public a fraudulent document, which is a ''crime'', he can and should be prosecuted for that crime.

Additionally, under the [https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952], he does not fit into any category that would give him citizenship at birth. Barack Obama had a Kenyan father and an American mother.

The closest is section 301 a-7, where a person born to a US citizen outside the US and it's posessions must have a parent, who is a citizen, and has resided in the US for at least 10 years, of which 5 must be after the attaining the age of 14 years.

Since Barack Obama's mother was still 18 years old, even this does not apply.

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not attain citizenship at birth.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama was not qualified, constitutionally, to become POTUS.'''

'''Therefore, Barack Obama did not have the legal authority to sign anything as president, and all of the laws and executive orders written by him are legally void.'''

Leo Meller

2025-10-26T14:36:19Z

Markus Brummer: Some typos

Main Page

2025-10-26T13:27:25Z

Markus Brummer: Style

Main Page

2025-10-26T13:26:21Z

Markus Brummer: Added Leo Meller

Leo Meller

2025-10-26T13:20:02Z

Markus Brummer: Leo Meller

= Leo Meller is a friend of the West and the East =

Source: Finnish newspaper Iltalehti, January 19th and February 6th 1984.

Available from the [https://www.iltalehti.fi/nakoislehti archives]

== Background ==

Leo Meller is a finnish preacher, who has been a controversial figure for many decades. He is known for his sexual escapades with women followers, and he was convicted for tax evasion and fraud in the 80s.

He has a public missionary agency named Patmos, and they have delivered Bibles to the Soviet Union.

== Leo Meller is a Great Friend of the United States ==

Such deliveries have also included smuggling american political propaganda into the Soviet Union, and he received various documents in return. This included films and tapes. The drives were also given '''cyanide pills''' to commit suicide, in case they were captured during the delivery.

Leo Meller has also received funding from the United States. It is ''unclear'' for what purposes or services.

He also was the only finn attending the inauguration of Ronald Reagan. Not the finnish president, not the finnish prime minister, but an obscure nitwit preacher got to attend the inauguration of the President of the United States.

== Leo Meller is a Great Friend of Russia ==

On one delivery, the smugging van was stopped on the Soviet border. The drivers were apprehended and interrogated, they were subsequently released and the van was returned.

So:

* The KGB was informed of the smuggling of american political propaganda
* The KGB was informed that Leo Meller sent these couriers to the Soviet Union
* The KGB decided to return the van back to Leo Meller, because, apparently, they like him so much that '''they want him to try again'''

CIA

2025-10-26T12:48:16Z

Markus Brummer: Corona virus

= The Sins of the CIA =

Dennis Prager interviewed RFK Jr in 2023 when he was running for president.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRkDDODJ84 Interview]

== Sin #1 Spreading propaganda around the world and also in America ==

17:35-22:40

The CIA had in 1973 Operation Mockingbird that employed over 400 journalists across America to spread propaganda among the public. It was of course illegal to do so. The CIA has an approximately 10 billion dollar budget to influence political opinions around the world, which means they can spread propaganda and lies as they see fit. In 2016, Barack Obama signed an executive order that allowed the CIA to continue its propaganda efforts also on American soil.

== Sin #2 Illegal Bioweapons Program ==

23:00-34:27

The CIA's first task was Operation Paperclip, in which they recruited Nazi and Japanese war criminals to develop bioweapons in the United States. They were given new identities, new jobs and immunity from prosecution for war crimes. Richard Nixon decided to end the bioweapons program in 1969 and signed the Bioweapons charter, which the CIA, and therefore also the US Government, broke by secretly continuing the development of bioweapons.

== Sin #3 Anthrax attack on Congress in 2001 ==

Congress was debating the Patriot Act in 2001. The Act had a provision to give immunity from prosecution for federal officials who were found breaking the Geneva conventions and the Bioweapons charter, which carried a hanging offense. Two senators, who were stronly against the Act, Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, got an athrax letter to their offices in Congress. The FBI investigation concluded, that the Ames Anthrax had biological indicators pointing towards the CIA bioweapons program in Fort Dietrich.

One or more people in the CIA committed treason by attempting to murder members of the US Senate.

Also, the CIA also fits the description of a [https://legalclarity.org/18-u-s-c-2331-definitions-of-domestic-and-international-terrorism/ terrorist organization].

'''For this reason alone, all of CIA should be fired and permanently banned from the federal government.'''

== Sin #4 Corona virus ==

Since it was the CIA, who decided to illegally continue the bioweapons programs, it was legally feasible only as a dual use vaccine project. In order to use bioweapons on the field, own troops need to be immunized to the effects of the virus.

The CIA transferred the program to the Pentagon, which handed it over to the NIH and Anthony Fauci. The NIH transferred the vaccine and bioweapons program overseas to China, to a laboratory in Wuhan.

The Covid-19 epidemic was accidentally released from said lab, and the ensuing deaths are actually not fundamentally the fault of the CCP, but the CIA.

'''The CIA and the US Government handed over a bioweapons program to the Chinese Communist Party, in effect, for free.'''

'''The CIA is ultimately responsible for Corona Virus death toll, which is in the neighbourhood of 6 to 7 million people worldwide. This is more than jewish deaths during the Holocaust.'''

== Sin #5 The Murder of Jeffrey Epstein ==

Jeffrey Epstein was running a sex trafficking ring for the rich and wealthy people of the world. He was jailed and awaited trial, when he was found dead in his jail cell.

The video evidence was destroyed, that is why it was never found. The DOJ was recently released footage, which is incomplete. The metadata also reveals that it was edited with video editing programs, therefore it is an attempted coverup.

'''Therefore, step 1, Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his jail cell.'''

To achieve this, only the CIA has the information and the technology to pull this off. The operatives had to know the layout of the federal prison, impersonate a guard, and destroy video evidence from secure facilities.

'''Therefore, step 2, the CIA is the culprit.'''

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VccCLqwoZeo?t=260 Hindustani Times] reports that Donald Trump flew to the Epstein island seven times, which is a clear indication that Donald Trump slept with underage girls, and that Donald Trump, the President of tHe United States, is a ''pedophile''.

'''Therefore, step 3, the CIA had also a motive.'''

In order to cover up his crimes, Donald Trump ordered the CIA to murder an American citizen in his jail cell, so that he could not testify against him in court.

Nuclear Deterrence

2025-10-25T20:15:09Z

Markus Brummer: Style improvement

= Nuclear Deterrence =

== What it is ==

Nuclear deterrence is a strategy in international relations where the threat of retaliatory nuclear force prevents nations from launching a nuclear attack. It relies on the idea that the potential consequences of a nuclear conflict are so severe that they dissuade states from engaging in such actions.

The whole point of even having nuclear weapons means, that the actor gets an automatic psychological defense against first strikes.

== The folly of Donald Trump ==

On june 16th 2025, Donald Trump, the most powerful man on the planet, told the Iranians to evacuate Teheran. The [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114695407357588413 social media post] mentioned the words "nuclear weapon". The result was mass panic, when the population began to flee the Iranian capital.

What actually happened was, that Donald Trump implicitly threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iran. He is the sitting POTUS, with a sizable nuclear arsenal, and the most powerful military in the world. Donald Trump bluffed with nuclear weapons, and, in the end, he did not use them.

This comment destroyed decades of careful diplomacy, military planning and decisive actions by the US Armed Forces. The bad actors in the world no longer fear what the US president might do, his words no longer carry the same power. The threat of using nuclear weapons is lost, and this can be re-established only by actually using them.

'''Donald Trump destroyed the US nuclear deterrence with a single post in social media.'''

This is an even worse blunder than Joe Biden and his rout from [[Afghanistan]].

Donald Trump has made Global Nuclear War more probable.

Afghanistan

2025-10-25T20:12:56Z

Markus Brummer: Stylistic immprovement and typos

= The US rout from Afghanistan =

== Background ==

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after the attacks on 9/11 to Pentagon and the World Trade Center in New York City. The United States armed forces waged war against the Taleban and Al Qaeda succesfully, and after 20 years, Afghanistan had some semblance of central government in Kabul.

The air base in Kabul provided logistical and tactical support for the US and Afghani forces against potential terrorist threats. As long as the US was in control of it, drones, tanks and the air force could obliterate any opposing threat from the Taleban.

It also was in a central location globally, as it provided air dominance and regional control towards Iran, Pakistan, China and Russia. It also was a key refueling stop between Asia and the Middle East.

No force on the planet could overthrow the United States from the Kabul air base, nothing except the President of the United States.

== The folly of Joe Biden ==

Joe Biden ordered a rout of the US forces from Afghanistan in September 2021. There was very little planning, there was recommendations from senior military staff against it, and the execution was abominable. For a large part, civilians were not evacuated first, but were left as hostages, along with many US collaborators from the Afghani people.

'''The message to the world is clear: be a friend of the US, and they will abandon you and leave you to be murdered.'''

On top of that, the US Armed forces left bullets, rifles, tanks, drones, helicopters, aircraft and other military assets behind, which was worth billions of dollars. The Taleban use the rifles and RPGs and they can sell the rest to bad actors, including China, Russia and Iran, which can then reverse engineer US military technology.

If anyone else on the planet would finance terrorism with billions of dollars, and hand over US military technology to bad actors, they would face serious consequences. But, somehow, if the POTUS does it, it becomes kosher.

De jure and constitutionally, the US Congress is the last word on US interests, since it has the power to impeach the sitting president for treason. Treason is, of course, acting against the interests of the nation. Therefore, US Congress could have impeached Joe Biden for his decision to flee from Afghanistan.

Politically, when Congress does nothing, it immplicitly accepts the president's actions. And if the american people keep voting the same people to Congress, the american people implicitly accept that financing the Taleban with billions of dollars is all fine and dandy.

'''The US rout from Afghanistan was the worst US foreign policy decision in the last 50 years''', topping the US Congress decision to end military aid to the South Vietnamese government. That decision directly lead to the downfall of free Vietnam and the enslavement of the vietnamese people under Communism.

Donald Trump made an even worse blunder, destroying [[Nuclear Deterrence]].